AI Literacy
Working Group

The AI Literacy WG will build the LAM sector’s shared capacity to engage with AI systems thoughtfully, critically, and well. We will work together to develop the LAM-specific resources, recommendations, and good practices that make it usable across libraries, archives, and museums. We treat AI literacy as a sustained professional capacity, not a one-time training event.

AI Literacy: From Understanding to Practical and Critical Use of Artificial Intelligence

AI is reshaping how cultural heritage institutions describe collections, mediate reference and research, deliver instruction, and steward provenance. Staff at every level now make consequential decisions: when to use AI, when to refuse it, how to evaluate its outputs, and how to teach others to do the same. Most institutions, however, lack a shared vocabulary or scaffolded pathway for building this capacity across roles.

The Universal AI Literacy Framework (Lo, 2025) provides the scaffolding: five components (Technical Knowledge, Ethical Awareness, Critical Thinking, Practical Use, Societal Impact) across four progressive levels (Awareness, Foundational, Applied, Strategic). The WG’s work is to populate this scaffolding with LAM-specific substance – contributed by members from their own institutional experience – and to develop the resources, examples, and good practices the sector needs.

AI Literacy Working Group serves three audiences:

Our focus areas follow the Framework’s own stated development agenda: pedagogical strategies for the LAM context; assessment approaches that measure AI literacy at both individual and institutional levels; cultural and global adaptations including translation and regional case studies; and ongoing refinement as AI technologies and the issues they raise continue to evolve. We coordinate with the existing Teaching and Learning WG on areas of shared interest.

The next meeting will be on November 5, 2026 at 16:00 UTC.

AI Literacy Working Group, Library

AI literacy is the ability to understand, use, and think critically about AI technologies and their impact on society, ethics, and everyday life. The LAM sector has a particular role to play in building this ability, because our institutions are where communities go to make sense of information, and our staff model what careful engagement with AI looks like.” (Leo S. Lo)